The Bible and Radiometric dating (the situation with Carbon 14 along with other dating practices).

Many individuals are underneath the misconception that carbon dating proves that dinosaurs and other extinct pets lived an incredible number of years back. Just what numerous don’t understand is the fact that carbon relationship isn’t used to date dinosaurs.

The main reason? Carbon dating is just accurate straight back a couple of thousand years. Therefore then they would need to date it another way if scientists believe that a creature lived millions of years ago.

But there is however the difficulty. They assume dinosaurs lived scores of years back (rather than 1000s of years ago just like the bible claims). They ignore evidence that will not fit their preconceived notion.

Exactly what would take place if a dinosaur bone tissue had been carbon dated? – At Oak Ridge nationwide Laboratory, boffins dated dinosaur bones utilizing the Carbon dating technique. Age they came ultimately back with was just a few thousand yrs old.

This date would not fit the notion that is preconceived dinosaurs lived an incredible number of years back. Just what exactly did they are doing? They tossed the awaycomes out. And kept their concept that dinosaurs lived “millions of years ago” rather.

This can be practice that is common.

Then they utilize potassium argon, or any other techniques, and date the fossils once again.

They do this often times, making use of a different relationship technique each and every time. The outcomes is often as much as 150 million years distinct from one another! – how’s that for an “exact” science?

Then they find the date they like most readily useful, in relation to their notion that is preconceived of old their concept claims the fossil should really be (in relation to the Geologic column) .

So that they focus on the presumption that dinosaurs lived an incredible number of years back, manipulate the results then until they agree along with their summary.

Their presumptions dictate their conclusions.

So just why could it be that when the date does not fit the idea, the facts are changed by them?

Impartial technology changes the idea to guide the important points. They need to maybe not replace the known facts to match the idea.

A Dinosaur carbon dated at 9,890 and 16,000 years old never millions of yrs old like evolutionists claim

We have documents of an Allosaurus bone tissue that has been provided for The University of Arizona become carbon dated. The outcomes had been 9,890 +/- 60 years and 16,120 +/- 220 years.

“We did not inform them that the bones they certainly were dating were dinosaur bones. The end result had been sample B at 16,120 years. The Allosaurus dinosaur was allowed to be around 140,000,000 years. The examples of bone tissue had been blind examples.”

This test ended up being done on August 10, 1990

Comment from an audience: “Of program carbon relationship is not likely to work with your Allosaurus bone tissue. That technique is accurate to 40,000 years. Thus I would be prepared to get some good weird quantity like 16,000 years in the event that you carbon date a millions of yrs old fossil. 16.000 years by the real method continues to be 10,000 years before your God supposedly developed the world.” Amy M 12/11/01

My response: the limits are explained by me of Carbon dating below. The one thing you might like to consider though, is how will you understand it really is an incredible number of years old, giving an “incorrect” date (one which you think is simply too young) or if it is just a few thousand yrs old.

So far as your comments that 16,000 years is over the age of when Jesus created the planet, we all know that there surely is more carbon within the atmosphere than there was clearly a thousand years back. So a date of 9,000 or 16,000 years is more apt to be less. Maybe only 6,000 yrs old.

30,000 limit to Carbon dating year

Carbon dating is a good relationship device for a few things that we all know the general date of. A thing that is 300 years of age as an example. However it is not even close to an science that is exact. It really is back that is somewhat accurate a few thousand years, but carbon relationship just isn’t accurate past this. Thirty thousand years is approximately the limit. But, this doesn’t mean that the planet earth is 30 thousand yrs old. It really is much more youthful than that. (1)

Due to the earth’s decreasing magnetic field, more radiation (which forms C14) is permitted in to the atmosphere that is earth’s.

Willard Libby (December 17, 1908 September that is– 8 1980) and their peers discovered the means of radiocarbon dating in 1949. Libbey knew that atmospheric carbon would achieve equilibrium in 30,000 years. Because he assumed that the planet earth had been an incredible number of years old, he thought it absolutely was currently at balance. Nonetheless each time they test that, they find more c14 into the atmosphere, and possess recognized we are just 1/3 the best way to balance. (1)

– So what does this suggest? This means that centered on c14 development, our planet has to be lower than 1/3 of 30,000 years old. This might result in the planet not as much as 10,000 yrs old! (1)

Carbon dating is dependant on the presumption that the total amount of C14 when you look at the environment has been the exact same. But there is however more carbon within the environment now than there clearly was 4 thousand years back. (1)

Since carbon dating measures onenightfriend the total amount of carbon nevertheless in a fossil, then your date offered just isn’t accurate. Carbon dating makes an animal residing 4 thousand years back (whenever there clearly was less atmospheric carbon) may actually have lived 1000s of years before it really did.

The thing that was the amount that is original of in the environment?

A great guide on the flaws of dating techniques is “Radioisotopes in addition to chronilogical age of the earth” (edited by Larry Vardiman, Andrew Snelling, Eugene F. Chaffin. Posted by Institute for Creation analysis; December 2000)